linux-kernel - Re: vmevent: question?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOJsxLHh8bD7hoqG8nkuaib63PC3kCvD6_2U4iBsCz1JLvZ+xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:03:23 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
Cc:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Leonid Moiseichuk <leonid.moiseichuk@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: vmevent: question?

Hi Anton,

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Anton Vorontsov
<cbouatmailru@...il.com> wrote:
> It seems to be a pretty nice driver. Speaking of ABI, the only thing
> I personally dislike is VMEVENT_CONFIG_MAX_ATTRS (i.e. fixed-size
> array in vmevent_config)... but I guess it's pretty easy to make
> it variable-sized array... was there any particular reason to make
> the _MAX thing?

It made the implementation simpler but the ABI should support
variable-sized arrays. We can relax the limitation if necessary.

                         Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/