linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] hid: Introduce device groups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1204301350540.1856@pobox.suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:55:49 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] hid: Introduce device groups

On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Henrik Rydberg wrote:

> > > Just got the stacktrace on [1] though when running kernel with this 
> > > patchset. The trace popped during shutdown, and the machine froze 
> > > completely; I didn't have any kind of external console connected, so 
> > > unfortunately I don't have the beginning of the whole thing.
> > > 
> > > I haven't been able to reproduce it so far. This was after several 
> > > "parallel" plug/remove cycles of multiple HID devices driven by multiple 
> > > different drivers.
> > > 
> > > I haven't performed any analysis what this might be yet.
> > > 
> > > [1] http://www.jikos.cz/jikos/junk/autoloading-trace.jpg
> > 
> > It actually seems to be spinlock lockup (due to the NMI trigger being 
> > apparent at the very first line) on kbd_event_lock ...
> 
> Ah, yes. I take it you are talking about tty/vt/keyboard.c. So some
> random keypress during shutdown triggers the event, which eventually
> reaches input_pass_event(). From there on, the trace stays in the
> mentioned driver. First kbd_event() gets called, which takes the lock
> and goes on to, in turn, call kbd_keycode(), k_handler[2]() ==
> k_spec(), fn_handler[9]() == fn_hold(), which goes on to call
> stop_tty(). This function comes back to the driver, via con_stop(), as
> vt_kbd_con_stop(), which in turn takes the same lock. So unless the
> teardown of something in hid affects the choices made in the tty
> driver, it appears this is a different problem. Or?

I just came to the same conclusion a few minutes ago ... i.e. this is 
likely unrelated to the patchset and I just triggered it by pure 
coincidence on the patched kernel.

I will keep looking into it a little bit more. Dmitry, any immediate ideas 
by any chance?

Otherwise the series seems indeed fine and if I don't come across anything 
substantial once I am done with the review, I am considering pushing it 
for -next (I still have to look at quirks propagation Nikolai pointed 
out).

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/