[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F9EF43C.3090608@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:21:16 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@...plusct.com>,
kosaki.motohiro@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch 21/29] score: Use generic init_task
(4/30/12 4:16 PM), Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Same code. Use the generic version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Chen Liqin<liqin.chen@...plusct.com>
> ---
> arch/score/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/score/kernel/Makefile | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: tip/arch/score/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/arch/score/Kconfig
> +++ tip/arch/score/Kconfig
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config SCORE
> select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
> select ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
> select GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
> + select HAVE_GENERIC_INIT_TASK
>
> choice
> prompt "System type"
> Index: tip/arch/score/kernel/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/arch/score/kernel/Makefile
> +++ tip/arch/score/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>
> extra-y := head.o vmlinux.lds
>
> -obj-y += entry.o init_task.o irq.o process.o ptrace.o \
> +obj-y += entry.o irq.o process.o ptrace.o \
> setup.o signal.o sys_score.o time.o traps.o \
> sys_call_table.o
Almost patches delete arch specific init-task. But this patch doesn't.
Is this really intentional?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists