[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120430203743.GA8934@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:37:43 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/29] init_task: Use a generic init_task variant
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 08:15:50PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> All architectures do roughly the same to initialize init_task. The
> only architecture which deviates is ia64, but I could not figure out
> why it couldn't use the same setup as all other architectures.
>
> The following series converts all archs to a generic version.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
> ---
> arch/um/kernel/init_task.c | 38 -------------------
> arch/unicore32/kernel/init_task.c | 44 ----------------------
> arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c | 42 ---------------------
> arch/xtensa/kernel/init_task.c | 31 ---------------
> tip/arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c | 5 ++
> tip/arch/unicore32/Makefile | 1
> tip/arch/unicore32/kernel/Makefile | 2 -
> tip/arch/x86/Makefile | 1
> tip/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 2 -
> tip/arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 9 ++++
> tip/arch/xtensa/kernel/Makefile | 2 -
> tip/kernel/sched/Makefile | 4 --
> tip/kernel/sched/init_task.c | 24 ++++++++++++
Diffstat looks funny. Some tip stuff sneaked in.
Also I am missing patch 1..
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists