[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1335760199.20866.33.camel@pasglop>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:29:59 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: kaffeemonster@...glemail.com
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
matt@...abs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH V4 3/3] bpf jit: Let the powerpc jit handle
negative offsets
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 06:27 +0200, Jan Seiffert wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt schrieb:
> > On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:43 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> >>> Matt's having a look at powerpc
> >>
> >> Ok, he hasn't so I'll dig a bit.
> >>
> >> No obvious wrongness (but I'm not very familiar with bpf), though I do
> >> have a comment: sk_negative_common() and bpf_slow_path_common() should
> >> be made one and single macro which takes the fallback function as an
> >> argument.
> >
> > Ok, with the compile fix below it seems to work for me:
> >
> > (Feel free to fold that into the original patch)
> >
>
> Should i resend the complete patch with the compile fix?
Won't hurt...
BTW. Any idea about that bpf_program vs. sock_fprog issue I mentioned
earlier ?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists