[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120430010656.GE25022@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:06:56 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
Cc: Eric BĂ©nard <eric@...rea.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
Subject: Re: [ 14/62] mmc: unbreak sdhci-esdhc-imx on i.MX25
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:31:18PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Greg KH wrote:
>
> > 3.3-stable review patch.
> [...]
> > commit b89152824f993a9572b47eb31f4579feadeac34c upstream.
> >
> > This was broken by me in 37865fe91582582a6f6c00652f6a2b1ff71f8a78
> > ("mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix timeout on i.MX's sdhci") where more
> > extensive tests would have shown that read or write of data to the
> > card were failing (even if the partition table was correctly read).
>
> 37865fe91582 is v2.6.37-rc4~24^2~7 so it sounds like this patch
> should also be applied to 3.0.y.
>
> Here's a straightforward backport to account for the lack of
> v3.1-rc1~321^2~77 ("mmc: sdhci: make sdhci-pltfm device drivers self
> registered") and v3.1-rc1~125^2^2~5 ("mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: get rid of
> the uses of cpu_is_mx"). Sensible?
Looks good to me, thanks for doing this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists