[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120430015531.GA13098@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:55:31 -0400
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sasikantha babu <sasikanth.v19@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: Redundant assignment of dup_name in sysfs_rename
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:01:02PM +0530, Sasikantha babu wrote:
> It is redundant to assign "kstrdup" of "new_value" to "dup_name",
> Since we are overwriting "dup_name" with "sd->s_name"
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasikantha babu <sasikanth.v19@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/sysfs/dir.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/sysfs/dir.c b/fs/sysfs/dir.c
> index 35a36d3..4abd424 100644
> --- a/fs/sysfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/sysfs/dir.c
> @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ int sysfs_rename(struct sysfs_dirent *sd,
> /* rename sysfs_dirent */
> if (strcmp(sd->s_name, new_name) != 0) {
> error = -ENOMEM;
> - new_name = dup_name = kstrdup(new_name, GFP_KERNEL);
> + new_name = kstrdup(new_name, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!new_name)
> goto out;
Why not get rid of dup_name entirely now as it really isn't used at all?
That would make a more "complete" patch, care to redo this?
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists