linux-kernel - vmevent: question?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F9E39F1.5030600@kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:06:25 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: vmevent: question?


Hi Pekka,

I looked into vmevent and have few questions.

vmevent_smaple gathers all registered values to report to user if vmevent match.
But the time gap between vmevent match check and vmevent_sample_attr could make error
so user could confuse.

Q 1. Why do we report _all_ registered vmstat value?
     In my opinion, it's okay just to report _a_ value vmevent_match happens.
Q 2. Is it okay although value when vmevent_match check happens is different with
     vmevent_sample_attr in vmevent_sample's for loop?
     I think it's not good.
Q 3. Do you have any plan to change getting value's method?
     Now it's IRQ context so we have limitation to get a vmstat values so that
     It couldn't be generic. IMHO, To merge into mainline, we should solve this problem.
Q 4. Do you have any plan for this patchset to merge into mainline?

Thanks.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/