lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F9F279E.606@shealevy.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:00:30 -0400
From:	Shea Levy <shea@...alevy.com>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
CC:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] efi: Validate UEFI boot variables

Hi,

On 04/30/2012 04:11 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> A common flaw in UEFI systems is a refusal to POST triggered by a malformed
> boot variable. Once in this state, machines may only be restored by
> reflashing their firmware with an external hardware device. While this is
> obviously a firmware bug, the serious nature of the outcome suggests that
> operating systems should filter their variable writes in order to prevent
> a malicious user from rendering the machine unusable.

Any chance this will make it safe to use efibootmgr on Apple EFI 
firmware? I've been afraid to use it because I've read it can silently 
brick the device due to a mistake in efibootmgr. Obviously this won't 
correct that mistake, but with this applied should a successful variable 
set imply that the firmware wasn't bricked?

Cheers,
Shea Levy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ