[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1335830115-14335-9-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 01:54:42 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linaro-sched-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 08/41] nohz: Try not to give the timekeeping duty to an adaptive tickless cpu
Try to give the timekeeing duty to a CPU that doesn't belong
to any nohz cpuset when possible, so that we increase the chance
for these nohz cpusets to run their CPUs out of periodic tick
mode.
[TODO: We need to find a way to ensure there is always one non-nohz
running CPU maintaining the timekeeping duty if every non-idle CPUs are
adaptive tickless]
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>
Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
Cc: Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
Cc: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 0695e9d..f1142d5 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <linux/profile.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/cpuset.h>
#include <asm/irq_regs.h>
@@ -782,6 +783,45 @@ void tick_check_idle(int cpu)
tick_check_nohz(cpu);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPUSETS_NO_HZ
+
+/*
+ * Take the timer duty if nobody is taking care of it.
+ * If a CPU already does and and it's in a nohz cpuset,
+ * then take the charge so that it can switch to nohz mode.
+ */
+static void tick_do_timer_check_handler(int cpu)
+{
+ int handler = tick_do_timer_cpu;
+
+ if (unlikely(handler == TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE)) {
+ tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu;
+ } else {
+ if (!cpuset_adaptive_nohz() &&
+ cpuset_cpu_adaptive_nohz(handler))
+ tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu;
+ }
+}
+
+#else
+
+static void tick_do_timer_check_handler(int cpu)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
+ /*
+ * Check if the do_timer duty was dropped. We don't care about
+ * concurrency: This happens only when the cpu in charge went
+ * into a long sleep. If two cpus happen to assign themself to
+ * this duty, then the jiffies update is still serialized by
+ * xtime_lock.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(tick_do_timer_cpu == TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE))
+ tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu;
+#endif
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_CPUSETS_NO_HZ */
+
/*
* High resolution timer specific code
*/
@@ -798,17 +838,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart tick_sched_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
ktime_t now = ktime_get();
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
- /*
- * Check if the do_timer duty was dropped. We don't care about
- * concurrency: This happens only when the cpu in charge went
- * into a long sleep. If two cpus happen to assign themself to
- * this duty, then the jiffies update is still serialized by
- * xtime_lock.
- */
- if (unlikely(tick_do_timer_cpu == TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE))
- tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu;
-#endif
+ tick_do_timer_check_handler(cpu);
/* Check, if the jiffies need an update */
if (tick_do_timer_cpu == cpu)
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists