[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHGf_=ojhwPUWJR0r+jVgjNd5h_sRrppzJntSpHzxyv+OuBueg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 10:37:20 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, mgorman@...e.de,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, npiggin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Describe race of direct read and fork for unaligned buffers
> Hello,
>
> Thank you revisit this. But as far as my remember is correct, this issue is NOT
> unaligned access issue. It's just get_user_pages(_fast) vs fork race issue. i.e.
> DIRECT_IO w/ multi thread process should not use fork().
The problem is, fork (and its COW logic) assume new access makes cow break,
But page table protection can't detect a DMA write. Therefore DIO may override
shared page data.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists