linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] stable/for-ingo-v3.5 of IOAPIC abstraction (and then some users) for v3.5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+5PVA4OorzAkkBe+PayPPHa1k7=X6Y0ALg=jRWLyKxabAPpiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 May 2012 16:08:19 -0400
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	mingo@...nel.org, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, mlin@...pku.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] stable/for-ingo-v3.5 of IOAPIC abstraction (and then
 some users) for v3.5

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> -static void __init __ioapic_init_mappings(void)
> +void __init native_io_apic_init_mappings(void)
>  {
>        unsigned long ioapic_phys, idx = FIX_IO_APIC_BASE_0;
>        struct resource *ioapic_res;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index 1a29015..8526317 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -1012,7 +1012,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>        init_cpu_to_node();
>
>        init_apic_mappings();
> -       ioapic_and_gsi_init();
> +       x86_io_apic_ops.init();
>
>        kvm_guest_init();
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
> index 9cf71d0..35c5e54 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <asm/e820.h>
>  #include <asm/time.h>
>  #include <asm/irq.h>
> +#include <asm/io_apic.h>
>  #include <asm/pat.h>
>  #include <asm/tsc.h>
>  #include <asm/iommu.h>
> @@ -119,3 +120,10 @@ struct x86_msi_ops x86_msi = {
>        .teardown_msi_irqs = default_teardown_msi_irqs,
>        .restore_msi_irqs = default_restore_msi_irqs,
>  };
> +
> +struct x86_io_apic_ops x86_io_apic_ops = {
> +       .init   = native_io_apic_init_mappings,
> +       .read   = native_io_apic_read,
> +       .write  = native_io_apic_write,
> +       .modify = native_io_apic_modify,
> +};

You'll get a section mismatch warning on this struct.  It's not a huge
deal, but native_io_apic_init_mappings is annotated as __init whereas
this struct isn't.  In practice it doesn't seem to matter as
x86_io_apic_ops.init is only called in setup_arch, but it's still a
valid warning.

(First noticed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817645 )

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/