linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/11] mm: swap: Implement generic handler for swap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120501155747.368a1d36.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 1 May 2012 15:57:47 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Linux-Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-NFS <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] mm: swap: Implement generic handler for
 swap_activate

On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:17:49 +0100
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:

> The version of swap_activate introduced is sufficient for swap-over-NFS
> but would not provide enough information to implement a generic handler.
> This patch shuffles things slightly to ensure the same information is
> available for aops->swap_activate() as is available to the core.
> 
> No functionality change.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -587,6 +587,8 @@ typedef struct {
>  typedef int (*read_actor_t)(read_descriptor_t *, struct page *,
>  		unsigned long, unsigned long);
>  
> +struct swap_info_struct;

Please put forward declarations at top-of-file.  To prevent accidental
duplication later on.

>  struct address_space_operations {
>  	int (*writepage)(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc);
>  	int (*readpage)(struct file *, struct page *);
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/page_io.c
> +++ b/mm/page_io.c

Have you tested all this code with CONFIG_SWAP=n?

Have you sought to minimise additional new code when CONFIG_SWAP=n?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/