[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120501161131.90a9967a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 16:11:31 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [Patch 3/4] ipc/mqueue: strengthen checks on mqueue creation
On Tue, 01 May 2012 19:04:53 -0400
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com> wrote:
> > OK, then would EOVERFLOW suit things better?
>
> I have no seen to any confusion source this. thank you.
--- a/ipc/mqueue.c~ipc-mqueue-strengthen-checks-on-mqueue-creation-fix
+++ a/ipc/mqueue.c
@@ -687,13 +687,13 @@ static int mq_attr_ok(struct ipc_namespa
}
/* check for overflow */
if (attr->mq_msgsize > ULONG_MAX/attr->mq_maxmsg)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return -EOVERFLOW;
mq_treesize = attr->mq_maxmsg * sizeof(struct msg_msg) +
min_t(unsigned int, attr->mq_maxmsg, MQ_PRIO_MAX) *
sizeof(struct posix_msg_tree_node);
total_size = attr->mq_maxmsg * attr->mq_msgsize;
if (total_size + mq_treesize < total_size)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return -EOVERFLOW;
return 0;
}
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists