[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANkdjvZinRvHYPKLCFsd6z3FXgM4ScS1Ar9OjO3s1SLDFnridw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:03:23 -0700
From: George Porter <gmporter@...ucsd.edu>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: read() syscall slowing down due to other threads?
Hi all,
I've run into a weird phenomenon I was hoping someone could help me pin down.
I've got a multithreaded program which reads data off of 8 input
disks, and does some processing on it. I have 8 Reader threads, each
of which reads data off of one of the eight input disks. That data
gets passed to other threads, which do some processing (this is an 8
core machine). If I do no or minimal processing in those other
threads, the read() calls go at the speed of the disks (~100 MBps). I
measure that speed by taking a timestamp before the read syscall, then
afterwards, and dividing that into the read size (5MB). All seems
good.
However, if I start doing more computation on those other threads, the
read() syscalls take longer to read the same amount of data,
eventually slowing down to 50 MBps (50% slower). I've used
setaffinity() to isolate the Reader threads to one set of cores, and
the compute threads to a different set of cores, and so I don't think
it is CPU/scheduling interference.
Thoughts? Has anyone run into this before?
Also, if you could CC me directly on any responses I would appreciate it.
Thanks, George
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists