| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120502005605.GA15074@1984> Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 02:56:05 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> To: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: xt_recent: Add optional mask option for xt_recent On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:00:03PM +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: [...] > For me personally it is useful, because i have around 140 NAS > servers, and i give each of them /24 "gray" subnets, and in some > cases i need to handle bad users, that are changing dynamic ip and > attacking from new ip each time. I just block non-critical service > for whole subnet then, till technician on duty will solve issue > completely. And sure if attack are stopped, subnet will be unblocked > "automagically". OK, if you need this, I'm fine with it. > Sure this feature not critical, or "a must", and if code are not > good, it is up to you, if it should be added or not. I didn't say anything about the code yet. E-mail reviewing this will follow. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists