lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 02 May 2012 10:05:24 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	<david.vrabel@...rix.com>, "xen-devel" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] auto balloon initial domain and fix dom0_mem=X
 inconsistencies (v5).

>>> On 01.05.12 at 18:37, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 01:15:31PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> Changelog v5 [since v4]:
>>  - used populate_physmap, fixed bugs.
>> [v2-v4: not posted]
>>  - reworked the code in setup.c to work properly.
>> [v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/30/492]
>>  - initial patchset
> 
> One bug I found was that with 'dom0_mem=max:1G' (with and without these
> patches) I would get a bunch of
> 
> (XEN) page_alloc.c:1148:d0 Over-allocation for domain 0: 2097153 > 2097152
> (XEN) memory.c:133:d0 Could not allocate order=0 extent: id=0 memflags=0 (0 
> of 17)
> 
> where the (0 of X), sometimes was 1, 2,3,4 or 17 -depending on the machine
> I ran on it. I figured it out that the difference was in the ACPI tables
> that are allocated - and that those regions - even though are returned
> back to the hypervisor, cannot be repopulated. I can't find the actual
> exact piece of code in the hypervisor to pin-point and say "Aha".

Are you sure about this? For one, given that you wrote that you saw this
with as little as a single page off, I doubt there's any half way modern
system where ACPI tables all fit into a single page (2 would even seem to
be a theoretical minimum, as there ought to be one NVS region along with
the "normal" tables).

Second, the ability to repopulate shouldn't really depend on the nature of
the corresponding machine pages.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ