[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120502102541.GA22740@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 15:55:41 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, pjt@...gle.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
efault@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched, fair: Let minimally loaded cpu balance
the group
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> [2012-05-01 20:14:31]:
> @@ -3795,12 +3796,11 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(st
>
> /* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
> if (local_group) {
> - if (idle_cpu(i) && !first_idle_cpu) {
> - first_idle_cpu = 1;
> + load = target_load(i, load_idx);
> + if (load < balance_load || idle_cpu(i)) {
> + balance_load = load;
Let's say load_idx != 0 (ex: a busy cpu doing this load balance). In
that case, for a idle cpu, we could return non-zero load and hence this
would fail to select such a idle cpu? IOW :
balance_load = 0 iff idle_cpu(i) ??
> balance_cpu = i;
> }
> -
> - load = target_load(i, load_idx);
> } else {
> load = source_load(i, load_idx);
> if (load > max_cpu_load) {
>
>
- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists