[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120502120536.8794.22210.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 02 May 2012 16:08:29 +0400
From:	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To:	bfields@...ldses.org, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
Cc:	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...nvz.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] SUNRPC: separate per-net data creation from service
creation
v3: "SUNRPC: new svc_bind() routine introduced" patch was squashed with the
    "SUNRPC: check rpcbind clients usage counter before decrement" patch.
v2: Increase per-net usage counted in lockd_up_net().
This is a cleanup patch set.
It will be followed my LockD start/stop cleanup patch set and NFS callback
service containerization patch set (yes, I forgot to implement it).
Today per-net data is created with service, and then is service is starting in
other network namespace. And thus it's destroyed with service too. Moreover,
network context for destroying of per-net data is taken from current process.
This is correct, but code looks ugly.
This patch set separates per-net data allocation from service allocation and
destruction.
IOW, per-net data have to be destroyed by service users - not service itself.
BTW, NFSd code become uglier with this patch set. Sorry.
But I assume, that these new ugly parts will be replaced later by NFSd service
containerization code.
The following series implements...
---
Stanislav Kinsbursky (2):
      SUNRPC: new svc_bind() routine introduced
      SUNRPC: move per-net operations from svc_destroy()
 fs/lockd/svc.c             |   33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
 fs/nfs/callback.c          |   11 +++++++++++
 fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c           |    4 ++++
 fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c           |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h |    1 +
 net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c     |   12 +++++++-----
 net/sunrpc/svc.c           |   23 ++++++++++-------------
 7 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists