[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1205021426530.1880@hadrien>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 14:27:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: question about fs/jffs2/readinode.c
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 07:06 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> The function read_direntry in fs/jffs2/readinode.c contains the following
>> code:
>>
>> err = jffs2_flash_read(c, (ref_offset(ref)) + read,
>> rd->nsize - already, &read, &fd->name[already]);
>> if (unlikely(read != rd->nsize - already) && likely(!err))
>> return -EIO;
>>
>> if (unlikely(err)) {
>> JFFS2_ERROR("read remainder of name: error %d\n", err);
>> jffs2_free_full_dirent(fd);
>> return -EIO;
>> }
>>
>> Is it intentional that the first if doesn't free fd? At first I thought
>> that that might be the case, because what would be the point of having two
>> conditionals if they are going to do the same thing. But I can't see why
>> fd should not be freed either, so maybe the two conditionals are just
>> there to give different error messages?
>
> Hi Julia,
>
> I think this is a bug and thes conditionals can be joined into one.
Thanks! I will send a patch soon.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists