[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49obq666i8.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 09:45:51 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: jaxboe@...ionio.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
npiggin@...nel.dk
Subject: [patch, v2] block: don't mark buffers beyond end of disk as mapped
Hi,
We have a bug report open where a squashfs image mounted on ppc64 would
exhibit errors due to trying to read beyond the end of the disk. It can
easily be reproduced by doing the following:
[root@...-p750e-02-lp3 ~]# ls -l install.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 142032896 Apr 30 16:46 install.img
[root@...-p750e-02-lp3 ~]# mount -o loop ./install.img /mnt/test
[root@...-p750e-02-lp3 ~]# dd if=/dev/loop0 of=/dev/null
dd: reading `/dev/loop0': Input/output error
277376+0 records in
277376+0 records out
142016512 bytes (142 MB) copied, 0.9465 s, 150 MB/s
In dmesg, you'll find the following:
squashfs: version 4.0 (2009/01/31) Phillip Lougher
[ 43.106012] attempt to access beyond end of device
[ 43.106029] loop0: rw=0, want=277410, limit=277408
[ 43.106039] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138704
[ 43.106053] attempt to access beyond end of device
[ 43.106057] loop0: rw=0, want=277412, limit=277408
[ 43.106061] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138705
[ 43.106066] attempt to access beyond end of device
[ 43.106070] loop0: rw=0, want=277414, limit=277408
[ 43.106073] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138706
[ 43.106078] attempt to access beyond end of device
[ 43.106081] loop0: rw=0, want=277416, limit=277408
[ 43.106085] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138707
[ 43.106089] attempt to access beyond end of device
[ 43.106093] loop0: rw=0, want=277418, limit=277408
[ 43.106096] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138708
[ 43.106101] attempt to access beyond end of device
[ 43.106104] loop0: rw=0, want=277420, limit=277408
[ 43.106108] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138709
[ 43.106112] attempt to access beyond end of device
[ 43.106116] loop0: rw=0, want=277422, limit=277408
[ 43.106120] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138710
[ 43.106124] attempt to access beyond end of device
[ 43.106128] loop0: rw=0, want=277424, limit=277408
[ 43.106131] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138711
[ 43.106135] attempt to access beyond end of device
[ 43.106139] loop0: rw=0, want=277426, limit=277408
[ 43.106143] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138712
[ 43.106147] attempt to access beyond end of device
[ 43.106151] loop0: rw=0, want=277428, limit=277408
[ 43.106154] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138713
[ 43.106158] attempt to access beyond end of device
[ 43.106162] loop0: rw=0, want=277430, limit=277408
[ 43.106166] attempt to access beyond end of device
[ 43.106169] loop0: rw=0, want=277432, limit=277408
...
[ 43.106307] attempt to access beyond end of device
[ 43.106311] loop0: rw=0, want=277470, limit=2774
Squashfs manages to read in the end block(s) of the disk during the
mount operation. Then, when dd reads the block device, it leads to
block_read_full_page being called with buffers that are beyond end of
disk, but are marked as mapped. Thus, it would end up submitting read
I/O against them, resulting in the errors mentioned above. I fixed the
problem by modifying init_page_buffers to only set the buffer mapped if
it fell inside of i_size.
Cheers,
Jeff
Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
--
Changes from v1->v2: re-used max_block, as suggested by Nick Piggin.
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index e08f6a2..ba11c30 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static void bdev_inode_switch_bdi(struct inode *inode,
spin_unlock(&dst->wb.list_lock);
}
-static sector_t max_block(struct block_device *bdev)
+sector_t blkdev_max_block(struct block_device *bdev)
{
sector_t retval = ~((sector_t)0);
loff_t sz = i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode);
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static int
blkdev_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
struct buffer_head *bh, int create)
{
- if (iblock >= max_block(I_BDEV(inode))) {
+ if (iblock >= blkdev_max_block(I_BDEV(inode))) {
if (create)
return -EIO;
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static int
blkdev_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
struct buffer_head *bh, int create)
{
- sector_t end_block = max_block(I_BDEV(inode));
+ sector_t end_block = blkdev_max_block(I_BDEV(inode));
unsigned long max_blocks = bh->b_size >> inode->i_blkbits;
if ((iblock + max_blocks) > end_block) {
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 351e18e..ad5938c 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -921,6 +921,7 @@ init_page_buffers(struct page *page, struct block_device *bdev,
struct buffer_head *head = page_buffers(page);
struct buffer_head *bh = head;
int uptodate = PageUptodate(page);
+ sector_t end_block = blkdev_max_block(I_BDEV(bdev->bd_inode));
do {
if (!buffer_mapped(bh)) {
@@ -929,7 +930,8 @@ init_page_buffers(struct page *page, struct block_device *bdev,
bh->b_blocknr = block;
if (uptodate)
set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
- set_buffer_mapped(bh);
+ if (block < end_block)
+ set_buffer_mapped(bh);
}
block++;
bh = bh->b_this_page;
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 8de6755..25c40b9 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2051,6 +2051,7 @@ extern void unregister_blkdev(unsigned int, const char *);
extern struct block_device *bdget(dev_t);
extern struct block_device *bdgrab(struct block_device *bdev);
extern void bd_set_size(struct block_device *, loff_t size);
+extern sector_t blkdev_max_block(struct block_device *bdev);
extern void bd_forget(struct inode *inode);
extern void bdput(struct block_device *);
extern void invalidate_bdev(struct block_device *);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists