linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, arch/*/*/*signal*.c and all such

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120502141401.GK6871@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2012 15:14:01 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, arch/*/*/*signal*.c and all such

On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 11:37:50AM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > > The last thing. Matt, could you please look at
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/signal.git ? It seems to me
> > > you already sent some of these changes (use set_current_blocked/block_sigmask).
> > > Perhaps there are alreay in -mm or linux-next?
> > 
> > Forgot to add Matt, sorry for noise...
> 
> Any of the changes that aren't in Linus' tree will be in -mm and
> linux-next. The ones currently in linux-next are,
> 
> 07d969a parisc: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
> 5becb45 frv: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
> 3608417 blackfin: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
> cd21f1a unicore32: use block_sigmask()
> 2bb36fd h8300: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
> a624f4f score: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
> 2326e2e score: don't mask signals if we fail to setup signal stack
> b2f6181 microblaze: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
> f557a56 microblaze: fix signal masking
> 9ff7b4a microblaze: no need to reset handler if SA_ONESHOT
> 6cb49f5 microblaze: don't reimplement force_sigsegv()
> bd9767f ia64: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
> cdbc96c cris: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
> 295f127 mn10300: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
> 524987e m68k: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
> f0c96a3 m32r: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
> f0f0acd avr32: use block_sigmask()
> ef64059 avr32: don't mask signals in the error path
> 
> ... and this one from you, Oleg, that was sent as part of my series,
> 
> 3e6c120 avr32: use set_current_blocked() in handle_signal/sys_rt_sigreturn

OK, those commits cherry-picked into the beginning of the queue, the
rest rebased on top of them, dropping my duplicates.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/