linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/23] kmem slab accounting basic infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FA14F9F.10401@parallels.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2012 12:15:43 -0300
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>
CC:	<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devel@...nvz.org>,
	<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/23] kmem slab accounting basic infrastructure


>> @@ -3951,8 +3966,26 @@ static int mem_cgroup_write(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
>>                         break;
>>                 if (type == _MEM)
>>                         ret = mem_cgroup_resize_limit(memcg, val);
>> -               else
>> +               else if (type == _MEMSWAP)
>>                         ret = mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(memcg, val);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
>> +               else if (type == _KMEM) {
>> +                       ret = res_counter_set_limit(&memcg->kmem, val);
>> +                       if (ret)
>> +                               break;
>> +                       /*
>> +                        * Once enabled, can't be disabled. We could in theory
>> +                        * disable it if we haven't yet created any caches, or
>> +                        * if we can shrink them all to death.
>> +                        *
>> +                        * But it is not worth the trouble
>> +                        */
>> +                       if (!memcg->kmem_accounted&&  val != RESOURCE_MAX)
>> +                               memcg->kmem_accounted = true;
>> +               }
>> +#endif
>> +               else
>> +                       return -EINVAL;
>>                 break;
>>         case RES_SOFT_LIMIT:
>>                 ret = res_counter_memparse_write_strategy(buffer,&val);
>
> Why is RESOURCE_MAX special?

Because I am using the convention that setting it to any value different 
than that will enable accounting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/