[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFy02d13HkfwY-TEGwu=2cd8en+_rnrnwcwixGKRmdJRtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 19:58:46 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] ktest: A couple of fixes
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> Is git set up to not fast forward by default? (I need to give it another try)
Git will fast-forward by default if you do a pull and there is no
development of your own in your tree.
There are two exceptions:
- you explicitly say that you don't want to fast-forward (--no-ff or
"[merge] ff=false" in the git config file)
- if you pull a signed tag with a modern version of git.
That second case may be what you hit.
If you do a
git pull linus v3.4-rc5
in order to just update to the state of my latest tag, then git will
assume you want to do a new commit (and thus a non-fast-forward) just
so that git can record the tag signature in the commit.
The sad part is that I don't think you can even override the second
case. IOW, I think even "git pull --ff linus v3.4-rc5" will still do a
non-fast-forward merge.
That's inconvenient, and an unintended consequence of the behavior I
wanted as a top-level maintainer. But I really do think it's wrong for
normal developers who might validly just want to update to some
particular tagged release.
Junio? Any ideas?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists