[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201205021630.25233.hartleys@visionengravers.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 16:30:25 -0700
From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Question: Section mismatch warnings in drivers/net
Hello all,
I noticed a number of section mismatch warnings in various
drivers/net/ drivers. I was going to submit some patches to
clean them up but then saw these commits:
commit 948252cb9e01d65a89ecadf67be5018351eee15e
Author: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Tue May 31 19:27:48 2011 -0700
Revert "net: fix section mismatches"
This reverts commit e5cb966c0838e4da43a3b0751bdcac7fe719f7b4.
It causes new build regressions with gcc-4.2 which is
pretty common on non-x86 platforms.
Reported-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
commit e5cb966c0838e4da43a3b0751bdcac7fe719f7b4
Author: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Date: Mon Apr 18 13:31:20 2011 +0000
net: fix section mismatches
Fix build warnings like the following:
WARNING: drivers/net/built-in.o(.data+0x12434): Section mismatch in reference from the variable madge
And add some consts to EISA device ID tables along the way.
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Was the issue with the build regressions ever worked out? Would
patches to fix the section mismatches be appropriate now?
Regards,
Hartley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists