[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLHxLbzp+nfc72pzzyAe8W5w-phbHhREdJ7Mg5P9JHeF5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 11:07:47 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>,
Leonid Moiseichuk <leonid.moiseichuk@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: vmevent: question?
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:
> Sorry for my poor explanation.
> My point is when userspace get vmevent_event by reading fd, it could enumerate
> several attribute all at once.
> Then, one of attribute(call A) made by vmevent_match in kernel and other attributes(call B, C, D)
> are just extra for convenience. Because there is time gap when kernel get attribute values, B,C,D could be stale.
> Then, how can user determine which event is really triggered? A or B or C or D?
> Which event really happens?
Right. Mark the matching values with something like
VMEVENT_ATTR_STATE_CAPTURED should be sufficient?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists