linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: cp210x: Corrected USB request type definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ipgd3ako.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date:	Thu, 03 May 2012 10:58:31 +0200
From:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To:	Preston Fick <pffick@...il.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	preston.fick@...abs.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: cp210x: Corrected USB request type definitions

Preston Fick <pffick@...il.com> writes:

> diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c b/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
> index ec30f95..e67ccf3 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c
> @@ -188,8 +188,10 @@ static struct usb_serial_driver * const serial_drivers[] = {
>  };
>  
>  /* Config request types */
> -#define REQTYPE_HOST_TO_DEVICE	0x41
> -#define REQTYPE_DEVICE_TO_HOST	0xc1
> +#define REQTYPE_HOST_TO_INTERFACE	0x41
> +#define REQTYPE_INTERFACE_TO_HOST	0xc1
> +#define REQTYPE_HOST_TO_DEVICE	0x40
> +#define REQTYPE_DEVICE_TO_HOST	0xc0


Any particular reason you need to define these instead of just using the
standard flags from linux/usb/ch9.h directly in the requests?:

(USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE | USB_DIR_OUT)
(USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_INTERFACE | USB_DIR_IN)
(USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_DEVICE | USB_DIR_OUT)
(USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_DEVICE | USB_DIR_IN)

If nothing else, using those from the beginning would have avoided the
mis-labelling you are fixing up.



Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/