| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4FA2596C.7050509@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 06:09:48 -0400
From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
To: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, Ted.Ts'o.tytso@....edu,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@...mcloud.com>,
Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] ext4: add expose_stale_data flag in fallocate
On 05/03/2012 12:14 AM, Zheng Liu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is the v2 of FALLOC_FL_NO_HIDE_STALE in fallocate. Now no new flag is
> added into vfs in order to reduce the impacts and avoid a huge security hole.
> The application cannot call fallocate with a new flag to create an unwritten
> extent. It needs to call ioctl to enable/disable this feature. Meanwhile, in
> ioctl, filesystem will check CAP_SYS_RAWIO to ensure that the user has a
> privilege to switch on/off it. Currently, I only implement it in ext4.
Hi Zheng,
I thought that we had pretty much decided to try and fix the ext4 performance
impact, not pursue this?
Thanks!
Ric
>
> Even though I try to reduce its impact, this feature still brings a security
> hole. So the application must ensure that it initializes an unwritten extent
> by itself before reading it, and it is used in a limited environment.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * remove FALLOC_FL_NO_HIDE_STALE flag in vfs
> * add 'i_expose_stale_data' in ext4 to enable/disable it
>
> Regards,
> Zheng
>
> From 530045b4a1f75df5afd40c0e20c89917f97d7d5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Zheng Liu<wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
> Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 11:21:44 +0800
> Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2] ext4: add expose_stale_data flag in fallocate
>
> We can use fallocate to preallocate sequential blocks. But these extents are
> uninitialized. So when the application does a write, filesystem will
> initialized these unwritten extents and it brings a huge overhead in some
> cases.
>
> This patch adds a new flag in inode to indicate whether initialize an unwritten
> extent or not. This flag is enable/disable within ioctl that switch on/off this
> feature. The application must call ioctl to enable this feature before it tries
> to preallocate some blocks.
>
> Obviously, this feature brings a huge security hole. The application must
> guarantee to initialize this file by itself before reading it at the same
> offset. So the application *MUST* use it carefully.
>
> CC: Ric Wheeler<rwheeler@...hat.com>
> CC: Eric Sandeen<sandeen@...hat.com>
> CC: Ted Ts'o tytso@....edu>
> CC: Dave Chinner<david@...morbit.com>
> CC: Lukas Czerner<lczerner@...hat.com>
> CC: Andreas Dilger<adilger@...mcloud.com>
> CC: Szabolcs Szakacsits<szaka@...era.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu<wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 5 +++++
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 6 +++++-
> fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/ext4/super.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 0e01e90..f56caf0 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -593,6 +593,8 @@ enum {
> #define EXT4_IOC_ALLOC_DA_BLKS _IO('f', 12)
> #define EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT _IOWR('f', 15, struct move_extent)
> #define EXT4_IOC_RESIZE_FS _IOW('f', 16, __u64)
> +#define EXT4_IOC_GET_EXPOSE_STALE _IOR('f', 17, int)
> +#define EXT4_IOC_SET_EXPOSE_STALE _IOW('f', 18, int)
>
> #if defined(__KERNEL__)&& defined(CONFIG_COMPAT)
> /*
> @@ -908,6 +910,9 @@ struct ext4_inode_info {
> */
> tid_t i_sync_tid;
> tid_t i_datasync_tid;
> +
> + /* expose stale data in creating a new extent */
> + int i_expose_stale_data;
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index abcdeab..14f54f1 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -4269,6 +4269,7 @@ static void ext4_falloc_update_inode(struct inode *inode,
> long ext4_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> {
> struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
> + struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
> handle_t *handle;
> loff_t new_size;
> unsigned int max_blocks;
> @@ -4312,7 +4313,10 @@ long ext4_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> trace_ext4_fallocate_exit(inode, offset, max_blocks, ret);
> return ret;
> }
> - flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_UNINIT_EXT;
> + if (ei->i_expose_stale_data)
> + flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE;
> + else
> + flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_UNINIT_EXT;
> if (mode& FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE)
> flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_KEEP_SIZE;
> /*
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> index 6eee255..a37db8e 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> @@ -432,6 +432,47 @@ resizefs_out:
> return 0;
> }
>
> + case EXT4_IOC_GET_EXPOSE_STALE: {
> + int enable;
> +
> + /* security check */
> + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + /*
> + * currently only extent-based files support (pre)allocate with
> + * EXPOSE_STALE_DATA flag
> + */
> + if (!(ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + enable = ei->i_expose_stale_data;
> +
> + return put_user(enable, (int __user *) arg);
> + }
> +
> + case EXT4_IOC_SET_EXPOSE_STALE: {
> + int enable;
> +
> + /* security check */
> + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + /*
> + * currently only extent-based files support (pre)allocate with
> + * EXPOSE_STALE_DATA flag
> + */
> + if (!(ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + if (get_user(enable, (int __user *) arg))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + ei->i_expose_stale_data = enable;
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> default:
> return -ENOTTY;
> }
> @@ -495,6 +536,8 @@ long ext4_compat_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> case EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT:
> case FITRIM:
> case EXT4_IOC_RESIZE_FS:
> + case EXT4_IOC_GET_EXPOSE_STALE:
> + case EXT4_IOC_SET_EXPOSE_STALE:
> break;
> default:
> return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index e1fb1d5..6de2db0 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -943,6 +943,7 @@ static struct inode *ext4_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
> ei->i_datasync_tid = 0;
> atomic_set(&ei->i_ioend_count, 0);
> atomic_set(&ei->i_aiodio_unwritten, 0);
> + ei->i_expose_stale_data = 0;
>
> return&ei->vfs_inode;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists