linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/06] serial8250-em: Add Emma Mobile UART driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201205030846.55250.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Thu, 3 May 2012 08:46:54 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, horms@...ge.net.au,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, swarren@...dotorg.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...k.pl, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
	olof@...om.net, dan.j.williams@...el.com, alan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/06] serial8250-em: Add Emma Mobile UART driver

On Wednesday 02 May 2012, Greg KH wrote:
> > > +
> > > +config SERIAL_8250_EM
> > > +   tristate "Support for Emma Mobile intergrated serial port"
> > > +   depends on SERIAL_8250
> > 
> > Should we depend on arch=ARM or something similar?  Even if the
> > driver is written to be arch independent, if the Emma itself is
> > physically tied to ARM platforms, we probably don't need to be
> > building it for sparc allyesconfig etc.
> 
> Yeah, it doesn't build on x86-64, I get the following build problems:
>         ERROR: "clk_get_rate" [drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_em.ko] undefined!
>         ERROR: "clk_enable" [drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_em.ko] undefined!
>         ERROR: "clk_get" [drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_em.ko] undefined!
>         ERROR: "clk_put" [drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_em.ko] undefined!
>         ERROR: "clk_disable" [drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_em.ko] undefined!
> 
> So it should depend on some arch that has clk at the least.
> 
> Magnus, care to redo just this one patch that fixes this up?  I've
> applied the first 5 already.

I think it's best to make it depend on HAVE_CLK, but depending on
ARM && HAVE_CLK is also fine with me. I would not like to have it depend
on EMMA specifically though because I want to increase built coverage.

	Arnd

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/