linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/9] writeback: Remove wb->list_lock from writeback_single

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1336049283-5859-6-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Date:	Thu,  3 May 2012 14:47:59 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, dchinner@...hat.com,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] writeback: Remove wb->list_lock from writeback_single_inode()

writeback_single_inode() doesn't need wb->list_lock for anything on entry now.
So remove the requirement. This makes locking of writeback_single_inode()
temporarily awkward (entering with i_lock, returning with i_lock and
wb->list_lock) but it will be sanitized in the next patch.

Also inode_wait_for_writeback() doesn't need wb->list_lock for anything. It was
just taking it to make usage convenient for callers but with
writeback_single_inode() changing it's not very convenient anymore. So remove
the lock from that function.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c |   17 +++++++----------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 5d3de00..3b87dc8 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -328,8 +328,7 @@ static int write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 /*
  * Wait for writeback on an inode to complete.
  */
-static void inode_wait_for_writeback(struct inode *inode,
-				     struct bdi_writeback *wb)
+static void inode_wait_for_writeback(struct inode *inode)
 {
 	DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wq, &inode->i_state, __I_SYNC);
 	wait_queue_head_t *wqh;
@@ -337,9 +336,7 @@ static void inode_wait_for_writeback(struct inode *inode,
 	wqh = bit_waitqueue(&inode->i_state, __I_SYNC);
 	while (inode->i_state & I_SYNC) {
 		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
-		spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
 		__wait_on_bit(wqh, &wq, inode_wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-		spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
 		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
 	}
 }
@@ -418,7 +415,6 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
 	unsigned dirty;
 	int ret;
 
-	assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock);
 	assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock);
 
 	if (!atomic_read(&inode->i_count))
@@ -432,7 +428,7 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
 		/*
 		 * It's a data-integrity sync.  We must wait.
 		 */
-		inode_wait_for_writeback(inode, wb);
+		inode_wait_for_writeback(inode);
 	}
 
 	BUG_ON(inode->i_state & I_SYNC);
@@ -440,7 +436,6 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
 	/* Set I_SYNC, reset I_DIRTY_PAGES */
 	inode->i_state |= I_SYNC;
 	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
-	spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
 
 	ret = do_writepages(mapping, wbc);
 
@@ -587,6 +582,8 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
 			trace_writeback_sb_inodes_requeue(inode);
 			continue;
 		}
+		spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+
 		__iget(inode);
 		write_chunk = writeback_chunk_size(wb->bdi, work);
 		wbc.nr_to_write = write_chunk;
@@ -803,8 +800,10 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
 			trace_writeback_wait(wb->bdi, work);
 			inode = wb_inode(wb->b_more_io.prev);
 			spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
-			inode_wait_for_writeback(inode, wb);
+			spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+			inode_wait_for_writeback(inode);
 			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+			spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
 		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
@@ -1350,7 +1349,6 @@ int write_inode_now(struct inode *inode, int sync)
 		wbc.nr_to_write = 0;
 
 	might_sleep();
-	spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
 	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
 	ret = writeback_single_inode(inode, wb, &wbc);
 	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
@@ -1375,7 +1373,6 @@ int sync_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 	struct bdi_writeback *wb = &inode_to_bdi(inode)->wb;
 	int ret;
 
-	spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
 	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
 	ret = writeback_single_inode(inode, wb, wbc);
 	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/