lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120503140827.GA24981@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 3 May 2012 22:08:27 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@...ionio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: lower metadata writeback threshold on low dirty
 threshold

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:43:11AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> This helps write performance when setting the dirty threshold to tiny numbers.
> 
>      3.4.0-rc2         3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+
>   ------------  ------------------------
>          96.92        -0.4%        96.54  bay/thresh=1000M/btrfs-100dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>          98.47        +0.0%        98.50  bay/thresh=1000M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>          99.38        -0.3%        99.06  bay/thresh=1000M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>          98.04        -0.0%        98.02  bay/thresh=100M/btrfs-100dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>          98.68        +0.3%        98.98  bay/thresh=100M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>          99.34        -0.0%        99.31  bay/thresh=100M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>   ==>    88.98        +9.6%        97.53  bay/thresh=10M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>   ==>    86.99       +13.1%        98.39  bay/thresh=10M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>   ==>     2.75     +2442.4%        69.88  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.4.0-rc2
>   ==>     3.31     +2634.1%        90.54  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.4.0-rc2

Well, further tests show that it behaves very unstable:

       3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+         3.4.0-rc2-btrfs5+  
------------------------  ------------------------  
                   69.88       +16.4%        81.31  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-10dd-1-3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+
                   71.09        +1.4%        72.05  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-10dd-2-3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+
                   72.60        -1.7%        71.38  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-10dd-3-3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+
                   90.54        -0.9%        89.74  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-1dd-1-3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+
                   89.17       -90.2%     ==> 8.71  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-1dd-2-3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+
               ==> 14.96      +495.3%        89.06  bay/thresh=1M/btrfs-1dd-3-3.4.0-rc2-btrfs4+
                  408.23        +1.0%       412.26  TOTAL write_bw

Where the -btrfs5 kernel has one more patch to remove the write plug.

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ