[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120503145248.GJ3955@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 15:52:48 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Misael Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez@...com>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] MFD: twl6040: Allocate IRQ numbers dynamically
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 04:28:59PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 05/03/2012 04:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It looks like you're totally removing the use of irq_base which will
> > break any boards that didn't convert to DT. The usual idiom is to use
> In the current board files the pdata->irq_base set to some #defined
> value (which is a comfortably big number).
Are you sure there aren't any boards out there which rely on the
interrupt base (eg, using a GPIO with the IRQ output of a chip)?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists