linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/16] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120503150048.GI11435@suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 3 May 2012 16:00:48 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Linux-Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking V9

On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 03:28:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> This patchset is far less ghastly than I feared/remembered/dreamed ;)
> 

That might be the best comment the series ever received :)

> The mm parts, anyway.  Are the net guys on board with it all?

They are cc'd but have not given any feedback in a while. That could be
because they are happy with it or because if they felt the MM parts were
blocking the series then it was unnecessary to review the network parts.

Any of the networking people care to comment?

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/