[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA2A2F0.3030509@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 10:23:28 -0500
From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
CC: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] zsmalloc use zs_handle instead of void *
On 05/03/2012 08:32 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 5/3/12 2:40 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> We should use zs_handle instead of void * to avoid any
>> confusion. Without this, users may just treat zs_malloc return value as
>> a pointer and try to deference it.
>>
>> Cc: Dan Magenheimer<dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim<minchan@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/zcache/zcache-main.c | 8 ++++----
>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 8 ++++----
>> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c | 28
>> ++++++++++++++--------------
>> drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc.h | 15 +++++++++++----
>> 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> This was a long pending change. Thanks!
The reason I hadn't done it before is that it introduces a checkpatch
warning:
WARNING: do not add new typedefs
#303: FILE: drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc.h:19:
+typedef void * zs_handle;
In addition this particular patch has a checkpatch error:
ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
#303: FILE: drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc.h:19:
+typedef void * zs_handle;
--
Seth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists