[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120503170101.GF2592@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 10:01:01 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rcu: BUG on exit_group
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:55:14PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:57:19AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> Hi Paul,
> >>
> >> I've hit a BUG similar to the schedule_tail() one when. It happened
> >> when I've started fuzzing exit_group() syscalls, and all of the traces
> >> are starting with exit_group() (there's a flood of them).
> >>
> >> I've verified that it indeed BUGs due to the rcu preempt count.
> >
> > Hello, Sasha,
> >
> > Which version of -next are you using? I did some surgery on this
> > yesterday based on some bugs Hugh Dickins tracked down, so if you
> > are using something older, please move to the current -next.
>
> I'm using -next from today (3.4.0-rc5-next-20120503-sasha-00002-g09f55ae-dirty).
Hmmm... Looking at this more closely, it looks like there really is
an attempt to acquire a mutex within an RCU read-side critical section,
which is illegal. Could you please bisect this?
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists