[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1205031421490.7642@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 14:23:48 +1000 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kasatkin, Dmitry"
<dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Safford <safford@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] situation with fput() locking (was Re: [PULL REQUEST] :
ima-appraisal patches)
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Jon, thank you for summarizing the discussion - article
> http://lwn.net/Articles/494158/. As Jake Edge's previous LWN article
> http://lwn.net/Articles/488906/ said, we've been working on upstreaming
> the different integrity components for quite a while. Although
> IMA-appraisal isn't the last component, it is a major one and were
> hoping that it would be upstreamed in the near future. Is 3.5 still a
> possibility?
Not sure why you're asking Jon, but the technical issues raised by Al need
to be resolved before the code can be considered for upstreaming.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists