[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA2EBCC.5060905@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 May 2012 14:34:20 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] perf target: Introduce perf_target_errno
On 5/2/12 12:59 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Also it would be better to have it as PERF_ERRNO__PID_OVERRIDE_CPU, etc.
I thought you wanted subsystem based errno's (PERF_TARGET__XXXXX) versus 
one big set (PERF_ERRNO__XXXXX). Did you change your mind?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
