linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Kconfig options for wakelocks limit and gc (was: Re: [RFC][PATCH 8/8] PM / Sleep: Add user space ...)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201205040020.49130.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Fri, 4 May 2012 00:20:48 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
Cc:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, markgross@...gnar.org,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Kconfig options for wakelocks limit and gc (was: Re: [RFC][PATCH 8/8] PM / Sleep: Add user space ...)

On Friday, May 04, 2012, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > On Friday, April 27, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Friday, April 27, 2012, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> >> > 2012/4/27 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>:
> >> > > On Friday, April 27, 2012, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> >> > >> 2012/4/26 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>:
> >> > >> ...
> >> > >> > ---
> >> > >> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> >> > >> > Subject: PM / Sleep: Add user space interface for manipulating wakeup sources, v3
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Android allows user space to manipulate wakelocks using two
> >> > >> > sysfs file located in /sys/power/, wake_lock and wake_unlock.
> >> > >> > Writing a wakelock name and optionally a timeout to the wake_lock
> >> > >> > file causes the wakelock whose name was written to be acquired (it
> >> > >> > is created before is necessary), optionally with the given timeout.
> >> > >> > Writing the name of a wakelock to wake_unlock causes that wakelock
> >> > >> > to be released.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Implement an analogous interface for user space using wakeup sources.
> >> > >> > Add the /sys/power/wake_lock and /sys/power/wake_unlock files
> >> > >> > allowing user space to create, activate and deactivate wakeup
> >> > >> > sources, such that writing a name and optionally a timeout to
> >> > >> > wake_lock causes the wakeup source of that name to be activated,
> >> > >> > optionally with the given timeout.  If that wakeup source doesn't
> >> > >> > exist, it will be created and then activated.  Writing a name to
> >> > >> > wake_unlock causes the wakeup source of that name, if there is one,
> >> > >> > to be deactivated.  Wakeup sources created with the help of
> >> > >> > wake_lock that haven't been used for more than 5 minutes are garbage
> >> > >> > collected and destroyed.  Moreover, there can be only WL_NUMBER_LIMIT
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I think it would be better if the garbage collection and limit was
> >> > >> configurable and optional. I would probably turn both features off
> >> > >> since I do not want to chase down bugs because a wakelock was ignored,
> >> > >> and I think the garbage collection will erase stats that we care
> >> > >> about.
> >> > >
> >> > > OK, but would you mind if I added the configurability as a separate incremental
> >> > > patch?
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > That is fine with me.
> >>
> >> Cool, thanks!
> >
> > The following two patches add the configuration options for the limit and
> > garbage collector.  Please let me know if they are OK with you.
> >
> 
> Yes.

Good, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/