[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABEgKgoPf69-Ps5Gc6Rv-TVVBxvTdjOJCdnbh6DzTa4A2m2y9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 08:33:43 +0900
From: Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@...il.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Hiroyuki Kamezawa
<kamezawa.hiroyuki@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:57 AM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 May 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
>> If I add XX:+UseLargePages to the command line to use
>> hugepages it's even larger.
Ah, sorry. I couldn't understand this. Why performance difference gets larger if
usage of anon memory decreases ? I guess overheads are just added to anon page
faults and file cache handling. If you use Hugepage, anon memory overheads will
disappear.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists