| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4FA3958A.4080206@ti.com> Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 11:38:34 +0300 From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Misael Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez@...com>, Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] MFD: twl6040: Allocate IRQ numbers dynamically On 05/03/2012 06:26 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 06:13:16PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> On 05/03/2012 05:52 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >>> Are you sure there aren't any boards out there which rely on the >>> interrupt base (eg, using a GPIO with the IRQ output of a chip)? > >> Yes, I'm sure. > > Because...? The irq_base was used to map the nested interrupt numbers somewhere high enough. twl6040 has one irq line towards the CPU (comes via i2c_client->irq). With this change we just change the mapping of the nested interrupt range provided by twl6040 (instead of hardwired number we ask for suitable range). We have sdp4430 and PandaBoard with twl6040. They are fine. The other non upstream boards should be fine as well with this change. -- Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists