linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] MFD: twl6040: Allocate IRQ numbers dynamically

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120504121730.GG14230@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 May 2012 13:17:30 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Misael Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez@...com>,
	Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] MFD: twl6040: Allocate IRQ numbers dynamically

On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:55:37PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 05/04/2012 02:22 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >> The OMAP platform related drives has been already converted to use
> >> irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, nr_irqs, 0); to map their range (including GPIO,
> >> twl6030, etc).

> > How does this work for interrupts on things like SPI and I2C devices?

> You mean on devices like twl6040, twl6030, twl4030 (I2C MFD devices)?
> Or "irq expander" type of devices?

The latter, and also just any driver that delivers an interrupt via a
GPIO on OMAP - if the GPIO IRQ numbers are all dynamically allocated
then it gets hard to register an off-chip device and tell it which
interrupt to request.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)