linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Re: [RFC PATCH] namespaces: fix leak on fork() failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 04 May 2012 16:49:55 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	Louis Rilling <louis.rilling@...labs.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]  Re: [RFC PATCH] namespaces: fix leak on fork() failure

On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 07:13 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: 
> Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 00:55 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> >> CLONE_NEWUSER?  I presume you have applied my latest user namespace
> >> patches?  Otherwise you are running completely half baked code.
> >
> > I Removed CLONE_NEWUSER flag.
> >
> >> hackbench?  Which kernel are you running.  Hackbench in some kernels is
> >> really good at triggering cache ping-pong effects with pids, and creds.
> >
> > Not when pinned.  3.0 kernel without the debug stuff enabled in 3.4.git.
> > 
> > marge:/usr/local/tmp/starvation # taskset -c 3 ./hackbench
> > Running with 10*40 (== 400) tasks.
> > Time: 0.868
> > marge:/usr/local/tmp/starvation # taskset -c 3 ./hackbench -namespace
> > Running with 10*40 (== 400) tasks.
> > Time: 7.582
> > marge:/usr/local/tmp/starvation # taskset -c 3 ./hackbench -namespace -all
> > Running with 10*40 (== 400) tasks.
> > Time: 29.677
> 
> Interesting.  I guess what truly puzzles me is what serializes all of
> the processes.  Even synchronize_rcu should sleep and thus let other
> synchronize_rcu calls run in parallel.
> 
> Did you have HZ=100 in that kernel?  400 tasks at 100Hz all serialized
> somehow and then doing synchronize_rcu at a jiffy each would account
> for 4 seconds.  And the nsproxy certainly has a synchronize_rcu call.

HZ=250

> The network namespace is comparatively heavy weight, at least in the
> amount of code and other things it has to go through, so that would be
> my prime suspect for those 29 seconds.  There are 2-4 synchronize_rcu
> calls needed to put the loopback device.  Still we use
> synchronize_rcu_expedited and that work should be out of line and all of
> those calls should batch.
> 
> Mike is this something you are looking at a pursuing farther?

Not really, but I can put it on my good intentions list.

> I want to guess the serialization comes from waiting on children to be
> reaped but the namespaces are all cleaned up in exit_notify() called
> from do_exit() so that theory doesn't hold water.  The worst case
> I can see is detach_pid from exit_signal running under the task list lock.
> but nothing sleeps under that lock.  :(

I'm up to my ears in zombies with several instances of the testcase
running in parallel, so I imagine it's the same with hackbench.

marge:/usr/local/tmp/starvation # taskset -c 3 ./hackbench -namespace& for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ; do ps ax|grep defunct|wc -l;sleep 1; done
[1] 29985
Running with 10*40 (== 400) tasks.
1
397
327
261
199
135
72
marge:/usr/local/tmp/starvation # Time: 7.675

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/