linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/9] perf: Generic intel uncore support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1336154226.6509.49.camel@twins>
Date:	Fri, 04 May 2012 19:57:06 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, andi@...stfloor.org, eranian@...gle.com,
	jolsa@...hat.com, ming.m.lin@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] perf: Generic intel uncore support

On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 15:33 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> Thank you for your suggestion. One reason I choose hash table is that I'm uncertain
> the system behavior when hot-plug a CPU, the PCI uncore device is probed first or
> the CPU data is initialized first? If the PCI device is probed first, I think your
> code won't work because topology_physical_package_id may return incorrect id.

It had better first initialize the cpu data before it starts probing its
devices. Doing it the other way around just doesn't make any sense.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/