[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120504191731.4603.56791.stgit@srivatsabhat>
Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 00:47:48 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...nel.org, pjt@...gle.com,
paul@...lmenage.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, nacc@...ibm.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com, rob@...dley.net,
tj@...nel.org, mschmidt@...hat.com, berrange@...hat.com,
nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] cpusets,
hotplug: Implement cpuset tree traversal in a helper function
At present, the functions that deal with cpusets during CPU/Mem hotplug
are quite messy, since a lot of the functionality is mixed up without clear
separation. And this takes a toll on optimization as well. For example,
the function cpuset_update_active_cpus() is called on both CPU offline and CPU
online events; and it invokes scan_for_empty_cpusets(), which makes sense
only for CPU offline events. And hence, the current code ends up unnecessarily
traversing the cpuset tree during CPU online also.
As a first step towards cleaning up those functions, encapsulate the cpuset
tree traversal in a helper function, so as to facilitate upcoming changes.
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
kernel/cpuset.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 14f7070..23e5da6 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -2000,6 +2000,23 @@ static void remove_tasks_in_empty_cpuset(struct cpuset *cs)
move_member_tasks_to_cpuset(cs, parent);
}
+static struct cpuset *traverse_cpusets(struct list_head *queue)
+{
+ struct cpuset *cp;
+ struct cpuset *child; /* scans child cpusets of cp */
+ struct cgroup *cont;
+
+ cp = list_first_entry(queue, struct cpuset, stack_list);
+ list_del(queue->next);
+ list_for_each_entry(cont, &cp->css.cgroup->children, sibling) {
+ child = cgroup_cs(cont);
+ list_add_tail(&child->stack_list, queue);
+ }
+
+ return cp;
+}
+
+
/*
* Walk the specified cpuset subtree and look for empty cpusets.
* The tasks of such cpuset must be moved to a parent cpuset.
@@ -2019,19 +2036,12 @@ static void scan_for_empty_cpusets(struct cpuset *root)
{
LIST_HEAD(queue);
struct cpuset *cp; /* scans cpusets being updated */
- struct cpuset *child; /* scans child cpusets of cp */
- struct cgroup *cont;
static nodemask_t oldmems; /* protected by cgroup_mutex */
list_add_tail((struct list_head *)&root->stack_list, &queue);
while (!list_empty(&queue)) {
- cp = list_first_entry(&queue, struct cpuset, stack_list);
- list_del(queue.next);
- list_for_each_entry(cont, &cp->css.cgroup->children, sibling) {
- child = cgroup_cs(cont);
- list_add_tail(&child->stack_list, &queue);
- }
+ cp = traverse_cpusets(&queue);
/* Continue past cpusets with all cpus, mems online */
if (cpumask_subset(cp->cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask) &&
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists