[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120504200659.GQ14230@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 21:07:00 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...b.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Igor Grinberg <grinberg@...pulab.co.il>,
linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Handling of modular boards
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 07:34:08PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> One idea that I've heard before is to put device tree fragments into the
> kernel and dynamically add them to the device tree that was passed by the
> boot loader whenever we detect the presence of a specific device.
> This obviously means it works only for boards using DT for booting, but
> it allows us to use some infrastructure that we already have.
I think anything that relies on bootloaders (or DT for that matter) is a
bit of a non-starter for my personal use cases. Even where we're using
DT relying on a sane bootloader seems a bit scary - my personal use
cases would rely on updating this stuff in the field for non-technical
users who would have trouble recovering from issues.
> An intermediate solution that I really like is the ability to
> stuff device tree fragments on extension board themselves, but that
> can only work for new designs and causes problems when that information
> is not actually correct.
I can see the theory, but I can also see some practical concerns. And
with the boards I'm working with we currently have 8 bits of data so...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists