[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1336090207.18712.9.camel@pasglop>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 10:10:07 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@...il.com>
Cc: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: use local var instead of
local_paca->irq_happened directly in __check_irq_replay
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 07:35 +0800, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
> > No, Only comment the test, you must absolutely leave the
> > __hard_irq_disable() call ! That's the whole point of the test, make
> > sure we unconditionally disable to see if that fixes the problem, in
> > which case that will tell us that we somewhere accidentally leave
> > irq_happened set to 0x01 while irqs are hard enabled.
>
> It can work.
> My system has been running for about 15 hours without crash.
Ok, so now we need to understand under what circumstances we end up
in a situation where paca->irq_happened is 0x01 and IRQs are hard
enabled. I have a few ideas of things to look at but I'm also off
for the week-end.
I'll have a look next week.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists