[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120504204245.112426672@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 13:42:47 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Subject: [ 03/47] NFSv4: Ensure that we check lock exclusive/shared type against open modes
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
commit 55725513b5ef9d462aa3e18527658a0362aaae83 upstream.
Since we may be simulating flock() locks using NFS byte range locks,
we can't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode for us.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -4558,6 +4558,20 @@ nfs4_proc_lock(struct file *filp, int cm
if (state == NULL)
return -ENOLCK;
+ /*
+ * Don't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode,
+ * since it won't do this for flock() locks.
+ */
+ switch (request->fl_type & (F_RDLCK|F_WRLCK|F_UNLCK)) {
+ case F_RDLCK:
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
+ return -EBADF;
+ break;
+ case F_WRLCK:
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
+ return -EBADF;
+ }
+
do {
status = nfs4_proc_setlk(state, cmd, request);
if ((status != -EAGAIN) || IS_SETLK(cmd))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists