[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1336165294.6509.76.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 23:01:34 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mingo@...nel.org, pjt@...gle.com, paul@...lmenage.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rjw@...k.pl, nacc@...ibm.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com, rob@...dley.net, tj@...nel.org,
mschmidt@...hat.com, berrange@...hat.com,
nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix issues with cpusets
handling upon CPU hotplug
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 13:49 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> I think it's ok for hotplug to be destructive. But I guess I'm not
> entirely sure why cpusets can't retain user-inputted
> configuration/policy information even while destroying things currently?
> And re-instating that policy if possible in the future?
Two issues here:
- if you retain it for cpuset but not others that's confusing (too);
- we never retain anything, if you unload a module you loose all state
that was associated with it too. What makes this special?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists