[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120504204225.390919138@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 13:42:36 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: [ 12/75] xen/smp: Fix crash when booting with ACPI hotplug CPUs.
3.3-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
commit cf405ae612b0f7e2358db7ff594c0e94846137aa upstream.
When we boot on a machine that can hotplug CPUs and we
are using 'dom0_max_vcpus=X' on the Xen hypervisor line
to clip the amount of CPUs available to the initial domain,
we get this:
(XEN) Command line: com1=115200,8n1 dom0_mem=8G noreboot dom0_max_vcpus=8 sync_console mce_verbosity=verbose console=com1,vga loglvl=all guest_loglvl=all
.. snip..
DMI: Intel Corporation S2600CP/S2600CP, BIOS SE5C600.86B.99.99.x032.072520111118 07/25/2011
.. snip.
SMP: Allowing 64 CPUs, 32 hotplug CPUs
installing Xen timer for CPU 7
cpu 7 spinlock event irq 361
NMI watchdog: disabled (cpu7): hardware events not enabled
Brought up 8 CPUs
.. snip..
[acpi processor finds the CPUs are not initialized and starts calling
arch_register_cpu, which creates /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu8/online]
CPU 8 got hotplugged
CPU 9 got hotplugged
CPU 10 got hotplugged
.. snip..
initcall 1_acpi_battery_init_async+0x0/0x1b returned 0 after 406 usecs
calling erst_init+0x0/0x2bb @ 1
[and the scheduler sticks newly started tasks on the new CPUs, but
said CPUs cannot be initialized b/c the hypervisor has limited the
amount of vCPUS to 8 - as per the dom0_max_vcpus=8 flag.
The spinlock tries to kick the other CPU, but the structure for that
is not initialized and we crash.]
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffffffffffed8
IP: [<ffffffff81035289>] xen_spin_lock+0x29/0x60
PGD 180d067 PUD 180e067 PMD 0
Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
CPU 7
Modules linked in:
Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.4.0-rc2upstream-00001-gf5154e8 #1 Intel Corporation S2600CP/S2600CP
RIP: e030:[<ffffffff81035289>] [<ffffffff81035289>] xen_spin_lock+0x29/0x60
RSP: e02b:ffff8801fb9b3a70 EFLAGS: 00010282
With this patch, we cap the amount of vCPUS that the initial domain
can run, to exactly what dom0_max_vcpus=X has specified.
In the future, if there is a hypercall that will allow a running
domain to expand past its initial set of vCPUS, this patch should
be re-evaluated.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ static void __init xen_fill_possible_map
static void __init xen_filter_cpu_maps(void)
{
int i, rc;
+ unsigned int subtract = 0;
if (!xen_initial_domain())
return;
@@ -186,8 +187,22 @@ static void __init xen_filter_cpu_maps(v
} else {
set_cpu_possible(i, false);
set_cpu_present(i, false);
+ subtract++;
}
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+ /* This is akin to using 'nr_cpus' on the Linux command line.
+ * Which is OK as when we use 'dom0_max_vcpus=X' we can only
+ * have up to X, while nr_cpu_ids is greater than X. This
+ * normally is not a problem, except when CPU hotplugging
+ * is involved and then there might be more than X CPUs
+ * in the guest - which will not work as there is no
+ * hypercall to expand the max number of VCPUs an already
+ * running guest has. So cap it up to X. */
+ if (subtract)
+ nr_cpu_ids = nr_cpu_ids - subtract;
+#endif
+
}
static void __init xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists