[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120504142926.a930ba90.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 14:29:26 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...two.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, avi@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kaber@...sh.net, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
ying.huang@...el.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, hpa@...or.com,
jeremy@...p.org
Subject: Re: [PATH v2 0/5] Code clean up for percpu_xxx serial functions
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:53:33 +0800
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com> wrote:
> I am sorry for spelling mistaken on konrad's email address, so resend
> for correct this. Please reply this resend email.
>
> ---------------
> Thanks for TJ's suggestion, I split the serial patch smaller for
> potential bisection convenience.
>
> Compare to v1 patch, this v2 patches has separate function replace
> patches and final dead code clean up patch.
>
> The net, xen and x86 part code are independent.
>
> After each part was accepted in kernel, the final(5th) clean up code
> do the real clean up in next merge window. I will refresh the patch
> at that time.
>
> Any further comments are appreciated!
>
I'm still sitting on these patches. The review was a bit inconclusive
and confusing and everyone will have forgotten all about everything. I
think I'll drop them and ask for a resend, please.
Be sure to update the changelogs so that they address everything which
was discussed last time - so we don't end up covering the same ground.
Please also Cc everyone who was involved in the discussion last time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists